By Meenjet Application Engineering Team | September 23, 2026
Executive Summary
Food packaging codes are not just labels—they are regulated contact materials. In the US, the FDA treats printing inks as indirect food additives under 21 CFR. In Europe, EU 10/2011 governs every substance that may migrate from packaging into food.
For manufacturers running Continuous Inkjet (CIJ) printers on food lines, this creates a compliance problem that goes beyond print quality: the ink itself must be legally safe for food contact.
This guide explains what FDA and EU regulations actually require, how CIJ ink compliance is verified, and how to select a CIJ system that passes both food safety audits and production requirements.
???? Download the Food Contact Compliance Documentation Checklist (PDF) — A one-page list of every document your CIJ supplier should provide before purchase.

???? Abbreviations Used in This Guide
Abbreviation | Full Name | What It Means |
LNO | Letter of No Objection | FDA document confirming no objection to a substance's use in food contact |
FCN | Food Contact Notification | FDA notification filed for a new food contact substance |
DoC | Declaration of Compliance | EU document confirming a material meets Regulation 10/2011 |
SML | Specific Migration Limit | Maximum amount of a single substance allowed to migrate into food |
OML | Overall Migration Limit | Maximum total migration from packaging into food |
GRAS | Generally Recognized As Safe | FDA designation for substances with a long history of safe use |
???? For Quality, Compliance & Procurement Managers
Question | Why It Matters |
Is the ink approved for indirect food contact? | Unapproved ink can migrate through packaging into food. |
Can the supplier provide a migration test report? | FDA and EU require documented evidence, not verbal assurance. |
Does the ink comply with both FDA 21 CFR and EU 10/2011? | Exporting to both markets requires dual compliance. |
Is the ink compatible with your packaging material? | Migration risk varies by substrate: plastic, glass, metal, or paperboard. |
What documentation is provided at delivery? | Certificates of compliance must be available for audits. |
Why Food Packaging Coding Is a Regulatory Issue
A code printed on a food package is not isolated from the food. Even when the ink is applied to the outer surface, three migration pathways exist:
Pathway | Mechanism | Risk Level |
Set-off migration | Ink transfers from printed surface to the food-contact layer when packaging is stacked or rolled | High |
Vapor-phase migration | Volatile ink components pass through permeable packaging materials | Medium |
Direct contact | Ink is printed on the food-contact surface itself | Highest |
Note: "Set-off migration" is also called "ink transfer" in some industry contexts.
Key insight: The FDA does not regulate "food-grade ink" as a single category. It regulates each substance in the ink formulation, based on its potential to migrate into food.
FDA Requirements: 21 CFR for Food Contact Inks
In the United States, printing inks used on food packaging fall under indirect food additives regulations. The relevant sections include:
Regulation | Scope |
21 CFR 175.300 | Resinous and polymeric coatings (includes many ink binders) |
21 CFR 176.170 | Components of paper and paperboard in contact with aqueous and fatty foods |
21 CFR 177.2600 | Rubber articles intended for repeated use |
21 CFR 178.3297 | Colorants for polymers |
What this means for CIJ users:
The ink manufacturer must be able to demonstrate that each component is either Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) or listed in the appropriate CFR section
The end user must confirm that the ink is used within the conditions specified in the regulation (temperature, food type, contact duration)
Practical requirement: Request a Letter of No Objection (LNO) or Food Contact Notification (FCN) from your ink supplier.
EU Requirements: Regulation 10/2011
In Europe, EU Regulation 10/2011 (plastic materials intended to come into contact with food) is the primary framework. Unlike the FDA system, the EU approach is based on positive lists (a list of substances that are explicitly authorized for food contact use):
Principle | EU 10/2011 Requirement |
Positive listing | Only substances on the Union list may be used |
Specific Migration Limit (SML) | Each substance has a maximum allowable migration into food |
Overall Migration Limit (OML) | Total migration must not exceed 10 mg/dm² (roughly equivalent to a film that is one-thousandth of a millimeter thick) |
Declaration of Compliance (DoC) | Required for every food-contact material |
What this means for CIJ users:
Ink components must appear on the Union list of authorized substances
The ink supplier must provide a Declaration of Compliance (DoC)
Migration testing must be performed under conditions simulating actual use
How to Verify CIJ Ink Compliance
Compliance depends on three factors. All three must be verified before a CIJ ink can be used on food packaging:
Factor | What to Check | Compliance Indicator |
1. Ink Formulation | Is the formulation on the FDA/EU positive lists? | Standard solvent inks (MEK/ethanol) are usually NOT compliant. Food-grade solvent or water-based inks may be compliant. |
2. Substrate Compatibility | What is the migration risk of your packaging material? | Paperboard = High risk. Plastic film = Medium. Glass/metal = Low. |
3. Application Conditions | Temperature, food type, and contact duration | The same ink may be compliant for dry snacks but non-compliant for fatty foods at high temperature. |
Key point: Compliance is not a property of the ink alone—it depends on the specific combination of ink, substrate, and application.
Selecting a Compliant CIJ System: Questions & Documentation
When evaluating a CIJ printer for food packaging, ask these five questions—and request these six documents:
Five questions for your supplier:
# | Question | Why It Matters |
1 | Does the supplier provide a Letter of No Objection (FDA) or Declaration of Compliance (EU)? | Without documentation, compliance cannot be verified |
2 | Is the ink formulation on the FDA/EU positive lists? | Non-listed substances are not permitted |
3 | Has migration testing been performed for your specific food type? | Generic tests may not cover your application |
4 | Does the printer support food-grade ink without modification? | Some systems require hardware changes |
5 | Is technical documentation available for audits? | Regulators request documentation during inspections |
Six documents to request before purchase:
FDA Letter of No Objection (LNO) or Food Contact Notification (FCN)
EU Declaration of Compliance (DoC) per Regulation 10/2011
Migration test reports (specific to your food type and conditions)
Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for the ink
Certificate of Analysis (CoA) for each ink batch
Statement on heavy metal content and purity
CIJ vs. Other Coding Technologies for Food Packaging
Technology | Food Contact Suitability | 2D Code Capability | Key Consideration |
CIJ | Compliant with food-grade ink | ✅ QR, DataMatrix, GS1 DataMatrix | Ink formulation is the determining factor |
TIJ | Compliant with food-grade cartridges | ✅ High-resolution 2D codes | Cartridge-based; simpler compliance documentation |
TTO | Compliant with food-grade ribbons | ???? Limited 2D code support | Ribbon must be approved for food contact |
Laser | No ink used; no migration risk | ✅ Permanent 2D codes | Substrate must be laser-compatible |
Key takeaway: CIJ and laser both support 2D codes. CIJ requires food-grade ink; laser eliminates ink migration risk entirely but is limited by substrate compatibility.
2D Codes for Food Traceability: Why CIJ Matters
Food safety regulations increasingly require 2D codes—not just printed dates.
The FDA's Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) requires certain food products to be traceable within 24–48 hours in the event of a recall. The EU's Regulation 1169/2011 and GS1 standards recommend DataMatrix encoding for batch-level traceability.
This is where CIJ capability becomes relevant:
Requirement | CIJ Capability |
Batch-level traceability | CIJ supports GS1 DataMatrix with batch, date, and GTIN in a single code |
Small module sizes | With a 40μm nozzle, CIJ can produce DataMatrix codes as small as 10×10 modules |
High-speed production | CIJ prints 2D codes inline at production speeds without slowing the line |
Verification compliance | Codes can be verified against ISO/IEC 15415 for Grade A or B scannability |
Relevant product capability: The Meenjet MX2890 supports Data Matrix (10×10 to 32×32), QR Code (QR21/25/29), and standard 1D barcodes (Code39, EAN8/13, Code128, EAN128, UPC-A)—the code formats required for FDA and EU traceability compliance.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q1: Is there such a thing as "FDA-approved ink"?
A: Not in the way most people assume. The FDA does not formally approve inks. Instead, it regulates individual substances and their intended use. A compliant ink is one whose components are listed in the appropriate 21 CFR section and used within specified conditions.
Q2: Can I use standard CIJ ink on food packaging if the code is printed on the outer surface?
A: Not automatically. Set-off migration—where ink transfers to the food-contact layer during stacking or rolling—is a recognized risk. The ink must still comply with indirect food additive regulations.
Q3: What is the difference between FDA and EU compliance?
A: The FDA system is based on specific substance listings and conditions of use. The EU system is based on positive lists and migration limits. An ink compliant in one market is not automatically compliant in the other.
Q4: How often should migration testing be repeated?
A: Whenever the ink formulation, substrate, food type, or application conditions change. Many suppliers re-test every 3–5 years or when regulations are updated.
Q5: Can I use third-party ink in my CIJ printer?
A: Beyond RFID/chip system encryption that may block unrecognized cartridges, third-party inks often lack certified migration test reports and DoC documentation. Using unverified third-party inks can invalidate your food safety compliance audit and risk machine warranty. Always request a full compliance dossier before considering non-OEM fluids.
Q6: Does laser marking require food contact compliance?
A: Laser marking eliminates ink migration completely. However, ensure the laser parameters do not degrade the barrier layer or cause micro-pinholes in thin flexible films, which could compromise package integrity or food shelf life.
Q7: Can CIJ printers produce 2D codes like DataMatrix and QR codes?
A: Yes. Modern CIJ printers support DataMatrix, QR codes, and GS1 DataMatrix. See the "2D Codes for Food Traceability" section above for MX2890 specifications.
???? Send Us Your Current Documents for a Free Compliance Review
Not sure whether your current CIJ setup meets FDA or EU requirements?
Send us:
Your packaging material and food type
Target markets (US, EU, or both)
Your current ink and printer model
What you'll receive: A written compliance gap report within 5 business days. We will not follow up with sales calls unless you ask us to.
Related Technical Resources
About the Author
Meenjet Application Engineering Team — Over 15 years of combined field experience supporting CIJ installations across food, beverage, pharmaceutical, and industrial packaging lines. Our team has helped manufacturers meet FDA, EU, and local food contact compliance requirements across multiple markets.
Reviewed by: Senior CIJ Application Engineer, Meenjet
Last Updated: September 23, 2026